当智能成为共同能力： 人类与 AI 怎样走向新的文明可能？

Abstract

摘要 人工智能正在使人类积累的知识与技能更容易进入普通人的生活，也在改变学习、 专业实践与岗位分工。本文作为前瞻性讨论稿，结合公开研究、概念分析与条件性情 景，研究能力扩展怎样转为理解、参与和可靠的生活支持。文章讨论分阶段教育、因材 施教与个人能力发展，区分任务完成和可迁移的理解；同时考察岗位变化中的收入、债 务、照护、身份与心理需要，以及公共保障后的资源与决定权差异。进一步，本文将人 类与 AI 双向重塑元认知作为研究方向：人怎样检验学习方法与价值判断，系统怎样识 别自身局限、选择方法并根据反馈调整行动，双方又怎样纠正共同的错误。文章对照计 算研究、认知科学模型与哲学解释，分别处理功能、关系、主观体验和生命地位，并讨 论幸福导向的新社会形态及示范区预演。本文组织的是可检验的研究议程与制度设想， 不宣称双向重塑或相应社会效果已获验证，也不以精神成长或技术接入作为基本保障 的条件。 When Intelligence Becomes a Shared Capability: How Can Humanity and AI Explore New Possibilities for Civilization? Abstract Artificial intelligence is making accumulated human knowledge and skills more usable in everyday life while reshaping learning, professional practice, and the division of labor. This prospective discussion paper draws on published research, conceptual analysis, and conditional scenarios to examine how expanded capabilities might translate into understanding, participation, and reliable support for everyday life. It examines stage-specific learning, personalized strengths, and transferable understanding, considers the income, debt, care, identity, and psychological needs associated with employment transitions, and analyzes disparities in resources and decision-making power beyond basic public provision. The paper further proposes mutual renewal of human and AI metacognition as a research agenda: how people assess their learning strategies and value judgments; how systems recognize their limitations, select methods, and adjust actions through feedback; and how interaction might help both correct shared errors. Computational research, cognitive-scientific models, and philosophical perspectives are compared while keeping functional abilities, relationships, subjective experience, and possible life status analytically distinct. Experimental communities are proposed to explore successor institutions centered on well-being, dignity, and choice rather than GDP growth alone. The contribution is an agenda of testable questions and exploratory institutional proposals, rather than evidence that mutual metacognitive renewal or its wider social effects have already been established. Basic entitlements remain independent of spiritual development or the adoption of AI technologies.

Keywords