The Philosophy of Hannah Arendt: Applied to the Systemised Self – Part 23, Masters Series.

Abstract

Hannah Arendt’s political philosophy begins where prediction cannot: with people who appear before one another, speak, act, and initiate what no model can foresee. This essay brings Arendt’s distinctions between labour, work, and action, and her accounts of plurality, natality, judgment, and the public realm, into conversation with the Systemised Self. In a fictional city council, our character Leila relies on an AI service to summarize residents’ submissions and propose responses. The tool increases access and reduces work, yet reliance may turn political claims into administratively settled preferences. Arendt’s concern is not that assistance itself destroys freedom; it is that the conditions for public appearance and disagreement can be weakened when a system presents its classifications as the people’s voice. The essay separates her critique of thoughtlessness from any claim that algorithmic governance is totalitarian, and it recognizes critiques of her distinction between social necessity and political action. Empirical studies of inference and ranking motivate questions but do not prove the Systemised Self or validate the proposed Algorithmic Alienation Index. The argument is conditional: digital mediation can support critical social thought when affected people can contest its categories, introduce unexpected concerns, and remain authors of decisions rather than outputs of a predictive account.

Keywords