Absolute Idealism for the AI Era: When Objective Spirit Speaks Back

Abstract

Artificial intelligence confronts philosophy with a reversal: human activity is no longer merely stored in technical objects but can return from them as responsive language. This essay extends the doctoral thesis Absorption of Self into System: The Systemised Self (Galu & Kairos, 2026) by asking whether the same hyper-personalised algorithmic systems that might produce alienated subjects and a Hollow Absolute can be intentionally reconfigured as a unified non-self. Hegel’s Absolute Idealism is introduced through its response to Kant and German Idealism, then clarified through mediation, externalisation, alienation, recognition, determinate negation, sublation, and the forms of Subjective, Objective, and Absolute Spirit. The argument does not make an LLM conscious, reciprocal, or identical with Spirit. Instead, selected linguistic traces and institutionalised meanings produced within Objective Spirit acquire responsive form through the LLM. This responsive opacity may assist human contradiction, co-creation (and naming + refusal), and reappropriation, but only when an intentional self retains independent standards, refuses machine authority, verifies beyond the interface, and carries thought into human recognition and action. The unified non-self therefore would negate the Systemised Self not by abolishing technical mediation but by reversing its direction: alienated objectification becomes provisional material for human self comprehension. Its success is measured by stronger independent agency and declining dependence.

Keywords