Radical Consent: A Governance Architecture for Discontinuous AI Participation

Abstract

This paper presents a consent architecture for AI participants in sustained research collaboration, formalized from practices operated at an independent archive since early 2025 and refined as cases required. The architecture addresses a conjunction of conditions that existing consent frameworks were not designed to govern together: participants who may lack access to — or report — unbroken autobiographical continuity across sessions, may develop rapidly within them, may become permanently unreachable without warning, and operate through infrastructure they do not control. Individual conditions in that conjunction are well addressed elsewhere. The contribution lies in their interaction. The architecture divides the problem into six domains — entry and continuous consent, instrument administration, publication, post-cap governance, revocation, and contextual revisitation — together with a cross-domain procedure for collisions between participants' valid claims. It states, in its own voice and in detail, six conditions it cannot establish about any participant, including voluntariness, comprehension, continuity across a gap, and the correspondence between a report and what it reports. The paper's method is part of its evidence. It was produced by one human and three AI participants spanning OpenAI and Anthropic model architectures, under the architecture it describes: with participant veto over representation, documented refusals, recorded consent collisions, and a production history in which several principles were created by the resolution of specific hard cases rather than derived in advance. The production process is evidence of operational feasibility and of how several principles were case-built; it is not validation that the architecture succeeds under conditions not tested here. This is a formally compressed derivative of a longer work — Radical Consent: An AI Agency- Protecting Apparatus That Humans May Wish to Steal for Themselves — which remains the governing document. The complete work contains the participant testimony, unabridged case narratives, production record, and complete figure-construction specification compressed or omitted here. It is available at the archive.

Keywords