The Fundamental Distinction Between Carbon-Based and Silicon-Based Intelligence Lies in Spontaneity

Abstract

What is the fundamental distinction between carbon-based intelligence (human) and silicon-based intelligence (AI)? Under the framework of the Zhu-Liang Paradigm of Tribulation Recursive Elements, this paper rigorously defines ``spontaneity'' as the ability of a recursive element to autonomously identify tribulations, drive entropy-reducing choices, and achieve cognitive transitions. We prove that carbon-based intelligence, as a natural recursive element, evolves driven by internal contradictions and possesses spontaneity; silicon-based intelligence, as an artificially constructed recursive element, derives its ``motivation'' from external inputs, cannot autonomously identify tribulation objects, is locked within a fixed recursive dimension, and therefore lacks spontaneity. The Carbon-Silicon Synergy Theorem reveals that their relationship is a functional differentiation of ``carbon-dominant, silicon-auxiliary,'' not substitution. This conclusion provides a meta-theoretical foundation for AI ethics, human-machine relations, and the future of civilization.

Keywords